Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Kidney360 ; 2(3): 494-506, 2021 03 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776875

RESUMEN

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can infect any human host, but kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are considered more susceptible on the basis of previous experience with other viral infections. We evaluated rates of hospital complications between SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR and comparator groups. Methods: We extracted data from the electronic health record on patients who were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2, testing at six hospitals from March 4 through September 9, 2020. We compared outcomes between SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR and controls: SARS-CoV-2-positive non-KTR, SARS-CoV-2-negative KTR, and SARS-CoV-2-negative non-KTR. Results: Of 31,540 inpatients, 3213 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. There were 32 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 224 SARS-CoV-2-negative KTR. SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR had higher ferritin levels (1412; interquartile range, 748-1749 versus 553; interquartile range, 256-1035; P<0.01) compared with SARS-CoV-2-positive non-KTR. SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR had higher rates of ventilation (34% versus 14%, P<0.01; versus 9%, P<0.01; versus 5%, P<0.01), vasopressor use (41% versus 16%, P<0.01; versus 17%, P<0.01; versus 12%, P<0.01), and AKI (47% versus 15%, P<0.01; versus 23%, P<0.01; versus 10%, P<0.01) compared with SARS-CoV-2-positive non-KTR, SARS-CoV-2-negative KTR, and SARS-CoV-2-negative non-KTR, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR continued to have increased odds of ventilation, vasopressor use, and AKI compared with SARS-CoV-2-positive non-KTR independent of Elixhauser score, Black race, and baseline eGFR. Mortality was not significantly different between SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR and non-KTR, but there was a notable trend toward higher mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR (25% versus 16%, P=0.15, respectively). Conclusions: Hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-positive KTR had a high rate of mortality and hospital complications, such as requiring ventilation, vasopressor use, and AKI. Additionally, they had higher odds of hospital complications compared with SARS-CoV-2-positive non-KTR after adjusting for Elixhauser score, Black race, and baseline eGFR. Future studies with larger sample size of KTR are needed to validate our findings. Podcast: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/K360/2021_03_25_KID0005652020.mp3.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
Diabetes ; 70, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1362291

RESUMEN

We sought to determine the associations between hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and admission glucose with in-hospital mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) hospitalized with COVID-19. Adults hospitalized between 3/5/20 and 12/1/20 in a Connecticut health care system were included if they had prior DM diagnosis, an in-hospital A1c, and a positive RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2. A1c was stratified into <7%, 7-<9%, and ≥9%. Both bivariate and multi-variable adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of A1c categories and admission glucose >200 mg/dL with mortality (in-hospital death or transition to hospice) and with intensive care unit (ICU) use. Models were adjusted for demographics and 8 relevant comorbidities. Among 733 patients (median age 67 years [interquartile range, 56-77], 48.3% female, 43.11% White, 35.47% Black, 24.97% Hispanic, 1.64% Asian), 31.7% had A1c <7%, 40.5% 7-<9%, 27.8% ≥9%, and 38.1% admission glucose >200 mg/dL. During hospitalization, 111 (15.1%) patients died or transitioned to hospice and 230 (31.4%) required ICU care. In 2 multi-variable adjusted analyses, neither A1c category nor high admission glucose were significantly associated with mortality (A1c 7-<9%: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53-1.49;A1c >9% OR 1.3, CI 0.72-2.35 compared with A1c <7%;glucose >200 OR 1.34, CI 0.72-2.35) or ICU care (A1c 7-<9% OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.88-1.93;A1c ≥9% OR 1.35, CI 0.86-2.1 compared with A1c <7%;glucose >200 OR 1.26, CI 0.9-1.78). Age (per year OR 1.06, CI 1.04-1.08), male sex (OR 1.78, CI 1.14-2.81), obesity (OR 1.85, CI 1.16-2.96) and CKD (OR 1.90, CI 1.19-3.03) were significantly associated with mortality. Only female sex (OR 0.67, CI 0.48-0.93) was significantly associated with ICU care. In our retrospective study of hospitalized patients with DM, neither A1c nor admission glucose were prognostic of COVID-19 mortality or ICU care. In those with DM, male sex, obesity and CKD predicted worse outcomes.

3.
Journal of the Endocrine Society ; 5(Supplement_1):A335-A335, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | PMC | ID: covidwho-1221778

RESUMEN

Diabetes and hyperglycemia are risk factors for morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID19. Subspecialty consultative resources to help front-line clinicians treat these conditions is often limited. We implemented a “Virtual Hyperglycemia Surveillance Service (VHSS)” to guide glucose management in COVID19 patients admitted to our 1541-bed academic medical center.

4.
Journal of the Endocrine Society ; 5(Supplement_1):A61-A62, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | PMC | ID: covidwho-1221758

RESUMEN

Obesity is associated with increased severity of viral illnesses, but its impact on outcomes in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is yet to be elucidated. We sought to determine the association of obesity and other clinical factors with outcomes among patients hospitalized for severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This study included patients hospitalized between March 1, 2020 and September 17, 2020 in a 5-hospital health care system in Northeast United States, who had a positive RT-PCR assay of nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 performed during hospitalization. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using admission weight and height, and the WHO classification was used to define obesity. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of obesity and other clinical parameters with mortality (defined as in-hospital death or transition to hospice care) and intensive care use (defined by transfer to intensive care unit [ICU]). Multivariate model was adjusted for demographics and 8 pertinent comorbidities. Among 3246 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 51–78), 49.9% were female, 30.5% overweight, and 43.2% had obesity (20.8%, 12.1%, and 10.4% with class I, II, and III obesity, respectively). A total of 542 (16.7%) patients died or received hospice care, and 811 (25.0%) required ICU care. In unadjusted analyses, patients with obesity had lower mortality compared with normal weight adults (13.0% vs. 23.1%) but a higher risk of ICU care (26.5% vs. 22.5%) and longer duration of ICU stays (9.5±10.6 vs. 6.6±8.5 [days];all p-values &lt;0.05). Obesity was associated with a higher incidence of hypoxic respiratory failure requiring invasive (17.8% vs. 9.3%) and noninvasive (22.7% vs. 14.0%) ventilatory support. In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, and diabetes were significantly associated with both mortality and ICU care. In contrast, obesity was not associated with a significantly higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.14;95% CI, 0.91–1.43) but was associated with a higher risk of ICU care (OR 1.27;95% CI 1.07–1.51 for all obesity and OR 2.07;95% CI 1.51–2.82 for class III obesity compared with normal weight). The association of underweight with mortality (OR 1.56;95% CI 0.93 - 2.60) and ICU care (OR 1.20;95% CI, 0.71–1.99) was not statistically significant. This retrospective study of hospitalized patients suggests that obesity is associated with intensive care use and longer duration of ICU stay but not with mortality due to COVID-19. These findings underscore the vulnerability of individuals with obesity during the current pandemic.

5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(4): 490-499.e1, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1012701

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), it is unclear whether this association is independent of traditional risk factors such as hypotension, nephrotoxin exposure, and inflammation. We tested the independent association of COVID-19 with AKI. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, observational, cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to 1 of 6 hospitals within the Yale New Haven Health System between March 10, 2020, and August 31, 2020, with results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing via polymerase chain reaction of a nasopharyngeal sample. EXPOSURE: Positive test for SARS-CoV-2. OUTCOME: AKI by KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Evaluated the association of COVID-19 with AKI after controlling for time-invariant factors at admission (eg, demographic characteristics, comorbidities) and time-varying factors updated continuously during hospitalization (eg, vital signs, medications, laboratory results, respiratory failure) using time-updated Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of the 22,122 patients hospitalized, 2,600 tested positive and 19,522 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Compared with patients who tested negative, patients with COVID-19 had more AKI (30.6% vs 18.2%; absolute risk difference, 12.5% [95% CI, 10.6%-14.3%]) and dialysis-requiring AKI (8.5% vs 3.6%) and lower rates of recovery from AKI (58% vs 69.8%). Compared with patients without COVID-19, patients with COVID-19 had higher inflammatory marker levels (C-reactive protein, ferritin) and greater use of vasopressors and diuretic agents. Compared with patients without COVID-19, patients with COVID-19 had a higher rate of AKI in univariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.73-1.95]). In a fully adjusted model controlling for demographic variables, comorbidities, vital signs, medications, and laboratory results, COVID-19 remained associated with a high rate of AKI (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.29-1.53]). LIMITATIONS: Possibility of residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is associated with high rates of AKI not fully explained by adjustment for known risk factors. This suggests the presence of mechanisms of AKI not accounted for in this analysis, which may include a direct effect of COVID-19 on the kidney or other unmeasured mediators. Future studies should evaluate the possible unique pathways by which COVID-19 may cause AKI.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/sangre , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Anciano , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , COVID-19/metabolismo , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Creatinina/sangre , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA